Case Details

Hoarding - 57 animals
Warner, NH (US)

Incident Date: Tuesday, Aug 9, 2005
County: Merrimack
Local Map: available
Disposition: Convicted
Case Images: 1 files available

Abusers/Suspects:
» Wendy Ruff - State Citation
» Bryon Ruff - State Citation

Case Updates: 4 update(s) available

Case ID: 5323
Classification: Hoarding
Animal: cat, dog (non pit-bull), pig, chicken, goat
View more cases in NH (US)
Child or elder neglect
Login to Watch this Case

A two-story home was condemned after officials found five children amid roaming chickens and rotting trash, sleeping on sofas and sharing the property with 57 animals � 10 dogs, 1 puppy, 10 piglets, a pig, six geese, two ducks, 12 cats, three kittens, three rabbits, two goats and seven chickens.

"It was worse than what we thought it was going to be," Warner Health Officer Charles Durgin said yesterday of the West Joppa Road home.

On the morning of Aug 9, Durgin, police and a small cadre of local and state officials went to the residence of Bryon and Wendy Ruff armed with an administrative inspection warrant that gave Durgin the power to look inside the house and inspect the living conditions. Officials said they had received numerous complaints from neighbors about the home's "deplorable living conditions."

Warner Police Sgt. Scott Leppard said the town had to get the warrant before Division for Children, Youth and Families could involved.

The animals were removed from the property. The future of the five children, ranging in age from 7 to 17, is uncertain.

For now, they are with their mother. A distraught Wendy Ruff, who had earlier pleaded with two representatives from the DCYF over the state of her children, said she knew the home was a problem, but said it was still livable.

"The town of Warner has been after me for years," she said. "My kids are very healthy."

Ruff, who said she did not know where her 40-year-old husband, Bryon, was but believed he was on a drinking binge, said she did not have the money to clean the house up, and had been away in prison.

"I'm poor," she said.

She and her five children slept in the family minivan just feet from their home on an unpaved section of West Joppa Road Tuesday night.

Yesterday, Leppard said officials from the state Division for Children, Youth and Families would be coming by to take custody of the Ruff children if more suitable accommodations could not be found.

"They can't stay in a vehicle, it's not right," he said.

Officials did come later, but told Ruff that they could only stay one more night either in the car or in a tent on the grounds. However, Ruff later said she would stay in a hotel, and the children would be with family members.

Leppard said the family would be given a list of improvements that would have to be made to the home. If they chose not to, the town could make the improvements itself and bill the family. Other options include possibly seizing the home if the Ruffs refuse to act.

A walk through the now-empty home gives an idea of what officials found when they got to the unpainted house. Rotting trash, including used food containers and cola cans, is strewn about on the wooden floor, illuminated by a single light bulb hanging from above. Exposed pink insulation fiber has been torn from the wall.

On the first floor, there is a living room and a kitchen and what could be a small dining area. On the opposite end of the kitchen, stairs lead up to sleeping spaces that have two sets of mattresses and a sofa.

A smell of what officials say is animal urine pervades the home. Care has to be taken to avoid the multiple deposits of animal feces.

Lisa LaFontaine, head of the Monadnock Humane Society, one of four animal welfare groups which also joined the rescue, said they were now taking care of four dogs and about nine geese, all of which were under the temporary "protective custody" order by the state for all the animals.

LaFontaine said overall, the animals were in okay condition, but were thin and in need of grooming and exercise.

Ruff said she was upset the state veterinarian had ordered the removal of her animals after seeing the home. Ruff contended many of her animals were old, but not in bad shape. If she was abusing them, she said, they would have died.

Durgin, the local health officer, said both parents are unemployed, and complaints against them by neighbors began about five years ago.

He said they had tried several times to take a look inside but Wendy Ruff had not let them. "It's not something new," he said. "She can be very belligerent."

According to Leppard, Bryon Ruff recently served six months in the Merrimack County House of Corrections for probation violation, breach of bail and criminal mischief.

The 37-year-old Wendy Ruff is currently out on bail for charges including violating a protective order, criminal threatening and disorderly conduct, Leppard said.

She also recently served 20 days in the same jail for criminal threatening, domestic assault and criminal trespassing, he added.

According to one news report, Wendy Ruff believes that the family was setup by peeved neighbors. When asked about the state of the house, she said: "When we left that home that morning that house was not like that. I believe the Warner police dept and neighbors knew they were doin' that, I believe that."

Case Updates

A Warner, N.H., couple whose house was condemned in August 2005, are fighting to regain custody of their animals.

Dozens of animals were seized by state and local authorities after they found the family of seven living in filthy conditions. Byron and Wendy Ruff are trying to recover most of the 57 animals that were taken. "The dogs looked like they were malnourished," Sgt. Scott Leppard said. "They had no water or sustenance. The fowl didn't have any feathers on them." State officials said they found cats with flea-bitten ears and dogs with visible ribs. At least one animal died from heartworms. All of the animals were running free throughout the property. "Some were in good condition, and some were extremely neglected, missing body parts, for instance," Merrimack County Attorney Daniel St. Hilaire said. "They were not being fed properly, not having proper water."

The Ruffs have been convicted of endangering the welfare of their five children, and they will be sentenced on those charges next week. The property has been cleaned and the children have been returned to their parents, but the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals is fighting to keep the animals. John Place, Wendy Ruff's brother, who acted as their lawyer, said the animals were fine. "I don't think they should have been taken in the first place," Place said. "I know the animals, and I don't think they were abused. They may have hoarded a little bit, but they weren't abused animals."

Judge Brackett Scheffy said that he was leaning toward not returning the animals to the Ruffs and granting the SPCA permanent custody so they can be placed in new homes. A formal order is expected early next week.
Source: WMUR News - January 12, 2006
Update posted on Jan 20, 2006 - 11:21PM 
Bryon Ruff of Warner, whose home was condemned by town authorities last summer, appeared in Henniker District Court Thursday on eight charges unrelated to the condemnation.

The charges stemmed from an Aug. 29 incident at the home in which Ruff was charged with throwing a phone at his wife Wendy, striking her in the chest. Ruff, 40, had originally pleaded not guilty to all charges but later reached plea bargains, according to court clerk Margaret Hatfield.

Ruff, a father of five, was fined $1,000 on a charge of resisting arrest, $750 suspended, conditional upon two years� good behavior. A sentence of 6 months in the Merrimack County House of Correction for breach of bail conditions was suspended until Nov. 16, 2006, conditional upon good behavior and counseling. Two charges of simple assault and another charge of breach of bail conditions were filed without a finding, conditional upon one year of good behavior.

Three unrelated animal control violations were also suspended conditional upon six months of good behavior and restitution to the affected neighbors.
Source: Union-Leader - Nov 20, 2005
Update posted on Nov 21, 2005 - 1:03PM 
A family of seven in Warner, ordered to clean up their home or move out, is getting help from the community in their effort to stay in their house.

Last week, the Ruff family's home was condemned after town officials found it littered with trash and animal waste. Fifty-seven animals were taken to area shelters.

Homeowner Wendy Ruff said that allegations that her home was covered in feces from "wall to wall" aren't true. She said there's no way they can afford to get their pets back, but they are fighting to get their home back.

Despite reports of volunteers and donations pouring in, the Ruffs said they have funded most of the home improvement materials themselves, about $1,000 worth so far. A man from Massachusetts has donated sealer and sheetrock, another has helped haul garbage away, and a Concord business has offered some assistance.

"We thought we'd help out fellow human beings and come out and actually teach the kids how to lay sheetrock and do ceramic tiles in the bathroom," said Martin Mahon, of Ceramic Mechanics. "New Hampshire Tile donated the tile for it and I'm donating my teaching labor."

A Warner selectman, health officer and building inspector planned to visit the home late Tuesday afternoon to inspect the wiring and create a progress report, which will be presented at a meeting that night. Selectmen also plan to discuss waiving the Ruffs' trash transfer fees.
Source: WMUR - Aug 16, 2005
Update posted on Aug 21, 2005 - 5:31PM 
Police say they can't figure out why 57 animals were removed, but five children remain in their parents' custody after their home was condemned because of "deplorable living conditions."

"I have no idea why they're not acting on this," Sgt. Scott Leppard said yesterday in reference to the state Division for Children, Youth and Families. "How much worse can you get?"

State and local officials condemned the West Joppa Road home of Wendy and Bryon Ruff Tuesday morning. Rotting garbage was found throughout the home, in addition to animal urine and feces. Chickens were roaming through the house; the children had only sofas to sleep on.

Leppard said that during a July 5 meeting that included all of the town's selectmen, DCYF officials said they couldn't do anything about the children's situation without an inspection warrant to get in and look around. DCYF officials said the warrant "would give them a lot of teeth," Leppard said.

"Obviously, that has not come to fruition," he said about removing the children, whose ages range from 7 to 17.

On Tuesday's visit, state veterinarian Dr. Stephen Crawford seized 57 animals from the home, citing poor treatment and malnourishment; there was no food or water for the animals, he said.

Leppard said a walk-through of the home on Wednesday found little in the family's refrigerator apart from a chicken wing, some lettuce and tomatoes.

According to Leppard, problems with living conditions at the Ruff household date back five years. Each time DCYF has sent representatives to the house, the division would notify the family of an inspection three or four days before. That would give the Ruffs time to clean up, Leppard said.

Two DCYF field representatives spoke with Wendy Ruff Wednesday. She told them she and her children slept in the family minivan Tuesday night. DCYF officials told Ruff the family could stay only one more night in the van or in a tent on the property.

Leppard said that three of the five children were going to stay last night with John Place, Wendy Ruff's brother in Hillsborough. However, he added that late yesterday, Bryon Ruff was asking a neighbor to allow him and the two oldest children to camp out on the neighbor's land.

Yesterday, officials took further steps against the family, categorizing the structure as a "hazardous building" and ordering it to be improved or demolished.

Leppard said the list of improvements had been drawn up by selectmen and given yesterday to the Ruff family. The family is allowed at the house from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. to make improvements, which Leppard said they were doing yesterday afternoon with the help of some family members.

Because the home was previously owned by Wendy Ruff's parents and deeded to the children, officials served the notice to her and the remaining four living offspring, including Place.

The family has 60 days to make the improvements, or risk a possible lien on the home.

Warner Police Chief Bill Chandler said that 40-year-old Bryon Ruff, whose whereabouts were previously unknown, was there when the order was served.

"He didn't have much to say," he said.

Warner police said yesterday that Warner officer Ron Carter had received a call from the Concord-Merrimack branch of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, saying Wendy Ruff had offered $1,250 in cash to pay boarding fees to retrieve her animals.

According to Concord S.P.C.A. spokesman Sandy Clabaugh, that branch is currently holding five cats, three kittens and two adult dogs. She confirmed that Ruff had come in on Tuesday looking to pay to get her pets back, but did not believe she had specified any dollar amount.

Ruff was told the pets could not be returned to her without approval from a state veterinarian, and left without incident.

According to Warner police, Wendy Ruff is currently out on $3,000 bail accused of criminal threatening, among other charges in an unrelated case, and her husband was recently released from jail after serving six months for probation violation, breach of bail and criminal mischief.
Source: The Union Leader - Aug 12, 2005
Update posted on Aug 12, 2005 - 2:53PM 

Neighborhood Map

For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.

Back to Top

Add this case to:   Del.icio.us | Digg | Furl Furl |

References

The Union Leader - Aug 11, 2005
Channel 7 News - Aug 11, 2005
WMUR - Aug 11, 2005
Concord Monitor - Aug 11, 2005
WMUR - Aug 12, 2005

« NH State Animal Cruelty Map

Add to GoogleNot sure what these icons mean? Click here.

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2007 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy