Case Details
Share:

Case Snapshot


For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.


CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

Case #3720 Rating: 3.3 out of 5



Intentional destruction of protected robin eggs
Vermillion, SD (US)

Incident Date: Saturday, Apr 24, 2004
County: Clay

Disposition: Convicted

Defendant/Suspect: Glen Lawrensen

Glen Lawrensen, a Vermillion landlord, was fined $22 by the Fish and Wildlife Department after he reportedly willfully destroyed a nest of robin's eggs that was on the windowsill. Robins are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), which makes the destruction of their eggs a punishable offense.

According to the tenant that reported the situation, Lawrensen retaliated by terminating the tenant's lease, forcing him to find a new domicile. When the tenant asked Lawrensen why he had destroyed the nest, Lawrensen allegedly replied "There are too many robins around here. I do that on all my properties. Why are you treating me this way! Get the hell out of here!"

References

  • « Back to Search Results

    « More cases in Clay County, SD

    Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

    For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



    Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2011 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy