Case Details
Share:

Case Snapshot
Case ID: 9949
Classification: Unclassified
Animal: dog (non pit-bull)
More cases in EN
Login to Watch this Case



CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

Case #9949 Rating: 3.0 out of 5



Cruelty to animals
Mildenhall, EN (UK)

Incident Date: Thursday, Dec 31, 1998

Disposition: Convicted

Defendant/Suspect: Rodney Woolston

A man convicted of cruelty to his dog has appeared in court again after ignoring an order banning him from having pets.

Rodney Woolston, 42, was banned from keeping animals - apart from snakes - for 10 years after he was convicted in 1999 of cruelty to his German shepherd dog.

But an RSPCA inspector found he had another German shepherd dog at his home in Mill Street, Mildenhall, in December 2005 together with a cockatiel.

When the inspector called again in May he had a cockatiel in breach of the order.

Woolston admitted two charges of breaching the ban.

Magistrates at Bury St Edmunds gave him a two-year conditional discharge and ordered him to pay £500 costs to the RSPCA.

Michael Taylor, prosecuting for the RSPCA, said Woolston was given the option of having the dog and the bird rehomed.

But he refused and as a result he was prosecuted.

Woolston had nothing to say in court about the offences.

The court heard he owed more than £700 in outstanding fines and court costs for motoring offences.

References

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2012 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy