Case Details
Share:

Case Snapshot
Case ID: 8966
Classification: Hoarding
More cases in NS
Login to Watch this Case



CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

Case #8966 Rating: 3.3 out of 5



Hoarding 15 animals
Antigonish, NS (CA)

Incident Date: Friday, Apr 30, 2004

Disposition: Convicted

Defendants/Suspects:
» Evelyn Pottie
» Fomen Gero

An Afton couple have been banned from owning pets for 10 years after pleading guilty to animal cruelty charges.

Evelyn Pottie, 55, and her common-law husband, Fomen Gero, 45, were handed the ban on June 7 2006 in Antigonish provincial court for allowing the 15 malnourished animals that were seized from their home in 2004 to be in a state of distress.

Two of the animals were later destroyed.

As part of the sentence issued by Judge John Embree, Ms. Pottie was fined $157 and Mr. Gero $207.

Crown attorney Ron MacDonald said Thursday that the couple would have faced stiffer fines under the Animal Cruelty Prevention Act if they had not been on social assistance.

References

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2012 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy