Case Snapshot
Case ID: 864
Classification: Bestiality
Animal: other companion animal
More cases in Tulsa County, OK
More cases in OK
Login to Watch this Case

New features are coming soon. Login with Facebook to get an early start and help us test them out!



For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.


CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

Case #864 Rating: 3.8 out of 5



Wednesday, Sep 30, 1998

County: Tulsa

Disposition: Convicted

Defendant/Suspect: Arthur Ray Catlett

Arthur Ray Catlett, 48, pled guilty to possession of a homemade videotape showing a woman engaging in bestiality and performing other sex acts. Another commercially made videotape also included bestiality. The man was given a five-year prison term for possession of the homemade obscene videotape, a concurrent six-year prison term for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, and three concurrent one-year jail terms for possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia, and driving under suspension.

References


« More cases in Tulsa County, OK

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.