var _sf_startpt=(new Date()).getTime() Pet-Abuse.Com - Animal Abuse Case Details: Backyard breeder - 67 dogs seized from van - Oracle, AZ (US)
Case Details
Share:

Case Snapshot
Case ID: 6418
Classification: Hoarding, Neglect / Abandonment
Animal: dog (non pit-bull)
More cases in Pinal County, AZ
More cases in AZ
Login to Watch this Case



CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

  • Currently 3.00/5

Case #6418 Rating: 3.0 out of 5



Backyard breeder - 67 dogs seized from van
Oracle, AZ (US)

Incident Date: Wednesday, Nov 30, 2005
County: Pinal

Disposition: Convicted

Defendant/Suspect: Mary Elizabeth Hamilton

Case Updates: 1 update(s) available

In December 2005, sheriff's deputies found 67 dogs either living in a van or in a travel trailer owned by 60-year-old Mary Elizabeth Hamilton. Investigators say she was a breeder, but hadn't sold any dogs for some time.

Myers says, "She wasn't parting with any of the animals, so she kept getting more and breeding more until she ultimately ended up with these 67 dogs that were seized." Hamilton was arrested, booked into the Pima County Jail, but allowed to keep 7 dogs.

Investigators say she was aware of what she was doing, but this isn't the first time she's had problems with her dogs. Investigators say she was living in Pinal County before loading up the animals and taking them to Avra Valley where it all came to an end.
Joe Pyritz, Public Information Officer for Pinal County says, "They did cite her one time for kennel permit. The dogs were in really good shape. Those that were ill were being taken care of by a vet. She had paper records to back that up."

From what investigators have determined, she was selling her house in Oracle and was cleaning it up, so she loaded up the animals in a travel trailer. When investigators found them, they were living in a mess of urine and feces. That's why she was cited for unsanitary living conditions.
Reports show some of the dogs were missing eyes; apparently, eye problems are common for the breed.

The Humane Society says those who want to adopt a dog must come and fill out the paper work. If they don't get a Pekingese, there are other dogs who need homes as well.


Case Updates

Mary Elizabeth Hamilton, 61, was keeping her 68 Pekingese in a 28-foot travel trailer. She was issued 128 citations in December, but an agreement was reached with the Pima County Attorney's Office to reduce the number of counts. Hamilton is now living in Michigan and entered her plea via telephone.

As part of the agreement, she had to pay a $500 fine and complete 100 hours of community service. And, for the next 24 months, she is limited to owning seven animals, which all must be spayed or neutered.

Animal-welfare advocates were disappointed in the plea agreement, saying they work hard to bring those who commit animal cruelty to justice.
Source: KVOA News - May 21, 2006
Update posted on May 28, 2006 - 2:48PM 

References

  • KVOA News - December 6, 2005

« AZ State Animal Cruelty Map
« More cases in Pinal County, AZ

Add to GoogleNot sure what these icons mean? Click here.

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2011 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy