Case Details

Horse neglect
Bennington, NH (US)

Incident Date: Tuesday, Nov 30, 2004
County: Hillsborough
Local Map: available
Disposition: Convicted

Abuser/Suspect: Beth Alison Putnam

Case Updates: 2 update(s) available

Case ID: 3683
Classification: Neglect / Abandonment
Animal: horse
View more cases in NH (US)
Login to Watch this Case

An arrest warrant has been issued against Beth Putnam accused of underfeeding her horses, according to Police Chief Steve Campbell. She is facing 4 counts of cruelty to animals.

Four horses were seized from Putnam following an investigation by the state veterinarian, Dr. Clifford McGinniss. McGinniss said the horses had lost a lot of weight between a summer visit and one in December 2004.

"The horses looked good at that first visit," McGinniss said. "But by December, these horses had lost a lot of weight."

McGinniss said he and one of his technicians had told Putnam to provide hay, feed and water. The technician visited Putnam on several occasions and took photos of the horses.

"She said she'd fed them, but there was no hay chaff in the snow," McGinniss said of the last visit. "It was clear that she had not fed them. We contacted the New Hampshire Equine Humane Association, and one of their representatives came over with eight bales of hay. The horses are in safe custody now. They're being properly cared for."

This is not the first time Putnam has had horses seized from her, Campbell stated. "We took some horses from her about a year ago, but she had three or four horses left over."

The first seizure took place in the summer of 2003. Putnam claimed the action was illegal, and asked the selectmen to intervene in August. She also contacted the state Attorney General's Office, which concluded that her rights were not violated by the seizure, but that Putnam could pursue the matter in court if she wished.

"She never got those horses back," McGinniss said. "The deal was that if she gave up the three horses, she wouldn't face charges."

"The state was monitoring the current situation," Campbell said. "We were working with the equine society. It became evident that the horses had lost a lot of weight and were not getting hay, so we obtained an affidavit from the state veterinarian and requested a search warrant."

McGinniss said a horse's condition is evaluated on a one-to-nine scale that is commonly used in the equine world. A one on the scale is for a thin and emaciated horse, while nine is considered obese.

"An ideal weight for a horse is about four or five, depending on the use of the animal," McGinniss said. "The more weight a horse has, the less of his skeleton you're going to see. I rated her palomino at 3.5, which is not too bad, but you can't not have feed for them. The horses would probably still be there if she had only fed them like I asked her to."

Under state law, a first offense of animal cruelty is considered a misdemeanor, but subsequent offenses are considered to be class B felonies. Typically, conviction on a class B felony means from 3� to 7 years in prison, and the possibility of fines up to $4,000.

Case Updates

The state veterinarian says he cannot understand why a judge returned two horses to a woman convicted of animal cruelty.

"It boggles my mind," veterinarian Clifford McGinnis said. "I can't believe they got any of the animals back. She had three horses taken away in 2003, too. If you're found guilty of animal cruelty, you shouldn't get any of your animals back."

Hillsborough District Court Judge Douglas Hatfield Jr. returned two horses to Beth Putnam of Bennington on Monday after convicting her of two cruelty charges but acquitting her of two others. Reached Thursday morning, Hatfield declined to comment because the case is still pending.

Putnam, 41, was charged with cruelty in January for not feeding her four horses enough.

Bennington Police Chief Stephen Campbell, who prosecuted the case, said the judge found two of the horses were not as neglected as the others.

Defense lawyer Paul Haley said Putnam cares deeply about her horses and did not neglect them. Haley said the horses had stopped eating after Putnam changed their feed, but had just started eating again when authorities took them away.

Campbell disputed that account.

"You could see their ribs sticking out and a dip in their backs. They didn't look good," he said.

"I've never said she neglected them on purpose, but it's expensive to keep horses _ especially four of them. I don't think, in my opinion, she had the money to care for the horses."

Haley said Putnam hopes to get her other horses back when she is sentenced on April 4.

McGinnis examined the horses when they were taken away. He said he will recommend that horses in Putnam's care be monitored as part of her sentence.

Campbell and McGinnis said Putnam was charged with cruelty to three horses that were taken from her in 2003. The charges were dropped, but the horses were not returned to her.

Animal cruelty is a misdemeanor that carries a fine of up to $2,000 and up to one year in prison.
Source: Sea Coast Online - March 25, 2005
Update posted on Mar 29, 2005 - 3:16PM 
Hillsborough District Court Judge Douglas Hatfield Jr. returned two horses to Beth Putnam of Bennington on Monday after convicting her of two cruelty charges but acquitting her of two others.

Putnam will be sentenced on April 4.

Putnam was charged with cruelty to three horses that were taken from her in 2003. The charges were dropped, but the horses were not returned to her.
Source: Foster's Online - March 24, 2005
Update posted on Mar 24, 2005 - 5:06PM 

Neighborhood Map

For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.

Back to Top

Add this case to:   Del.icio.us | Digg | Furl Furl |

References

The Union Leader
Fosters Online - March 24, 2005

« NH State Animal Cruelty Map

Add to GoogleNot sure what these icons mean? Click here.

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2007 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy