Case Details
Share:

Case Snapshot
Case ID: 3587
Classification: Beating, Shooting
Animal: cat
More cases in NS
Login to Watch this Case



CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

  • Currently 3.50/5

Case #3587 Rating: 3.5 out of 5



Cat shot will pellet gun, beaten to death
Hants County, NS (CA)

Incident Date: Wednesday, Apr 30, 2003

Disposition: Convicted

Defendants/Suspects:
» Scott Riley
» Stephen Hawkins

Two Hants County men who shot a cat with a pellet gun and then beat it to death in 2003 pleaded guilty Tuesday and were fined $150.

Scott Riley, 22, and Stephen Hawkins, 20, were charged in 2003 after police found a videotape of the cat being killed.

The tape was in a video camera a third person was holding when police drove into a skate park in Mount Uniacke where people had open liquor.

The man with the camera was searched. Some marijuana was found in his pocket and police seized the video camera.

The man was taking a media course and always had the camera with him, he testified at an earlier hearing.

The recording was done in May or June 2003 and the faces of the two people in it were not visible.

Mr. Riley and Mr. Hawkins pleaded guilty in Windsor provincial court Tuesday (Jan 11, 2005) to charges of causing death or injury to an animal under the Animal Cruelty Protection Act.

Crown attorney Bill Fergusson said the police investigation determined that Mr. Riley's mother owned the cat and wanted it euthanized, although "if anyone wants to dispose of a cat or any other animal, there are more humane ways to do it," he said.

Mr. Riley's lawyer, Jim White, said the animal was suffering from a neurological disease so the woman asked her son to dispose of it.

"This has been a traumatic issue for him," Mr. White said.

He said Mr. Riley and Mr. Hawkins thought shooting the animal with a pellet rifle would be quick and harmless. But it didn't work and left the animal in more distress so they put it in a garbage bag and beat it to death.

The Crown and defence recommended $50 fines but Judge Alan Tufts went with the higher penalty.

References

Add to GoogleAdd to My Yahoo!Not sure what these icons mean? Click here.

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2010 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy