Case Details
Share:

Case Snapshot
Case ID: 3080
Classification: Shooting
Animal: dog (non pit-bull)
More cases in Bucks County, PA
More cases in PA
Login to Watch this Case


For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.


CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

  • Currently 4.00/5

Case #3080 Rating: 4.0 out of 5



Dog shot
Bensalem, PA (US)

Incident Date: Tuesday, Jun 17, 1997
County: Bucks

Disposition: Convicted

Defendant/Suspect: Daniel Edward Arant, Jr

Daniel Edward Arant, Jr, 34, said he shot his neighbor's pet in self-defense after the animal went after him.

He was placed in a program for first-time, nonviolent offenders that will leave him with a clear criminal record if he successfully completes an 18-month probation.

In addition to the 18-month probation, he was ordered in Bucks County Court to seek a psychological evaluation, pay $237.70 to Ronald Miller, the dog's owner, for veterinary expenses. The dog survived after being treated for a gunshot wound.

References

  • The Philadelphia Inquirer - Dec 5, 1997

« PA State Animal Cruelty Map
« More cases in Bucks County, PA

Add to GoogleAdd to My Yahoo!Not sure what these icons mean? Click here.

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2010 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy