Cockfighting - over 150 birds Martinez, CA (US) Incident Date: Friday, Mar 26, 2004 County: Contra Costa Local Map: available Disposition: Alleged Abuser names unreleased

Case ID: 2156 Classification: Fighting Animal: chicken View more cases in CA (US) Login to Watch this Case

Teams of animal services officers and sheriff's deputies raided a barn near Martinez on Friday, March 26 2004 after a citizen complaint had suggested a cockfight might be taking place in the area.  The raid included the use of a Contra Costa Sheriff's Office helicopter.

The citizen had reported ongoing cockfights and seeing 100-plus fighting cocks confined in cages on the property, Animal Services deputy director Dan Barrett said. The fights, where roosters battle each other to the death, can draw large audiences and significant illegal bets. "We investigated and obtained a search warrant."

Animal Services coordinated the raid, with help from several sheriff's deputies and their helicopter.

A lieutenant briefed the officers at the Martinez animal shelter Friday evening before the raid: What to do if shots were fired. What to do if someone was injured. To look out for a booby trap, a board with nails sticking up.

The officers left the animal shelter at 7:30 p.m. and headed for a staging area in the parking lot of the main Post Office on Alhambra Avenue in Martinez. There, they linked up with the sheriff's deputies who would help them in the raid.

A few minutes before 8 p.m., everyone climbed into trucks and cars and headed down Franklin Canyon Road to the barn. Exactly at 8 p.m., the officers drove rapidly onto the property, leaped from their trucks and headed up the hill in the darkness.

After discovering there was no cockfight in progress, one team moved back down the hill to serve their warrant on an older man controlling the property at 2300 Franklin Canyon Road, in an unincorporated section of Martinez.

The other team of officers checked behind the barn where the fighting cocks were reportedly located. It was impossible to miss the 150-plus roosters in individual cages in a huge pen that ran the entire length of the back side of the barn.

One of the officers shined his flashlight through a locked gate down at the ground inside, revealing a 3-feet by 3-feet piece of plywood with hundreds of 3-inch galvanized nails driven up through it.

"Here's a booby trap," he said. Setting up a booby trap is a felony.

They found two plastic buckets hidden under some straw in a stall near the entrance to the rooster pen. Inside were vitamins, penicillin, syringes, a fighting blade and a pair of tiny round yellow "boxing gloves" that are tied around a rooster's legs during training fights so the birds can't hurt each other. Possession of cockfighting paraphernalia and of trained roosters are misdemeanors.

Meanwhile the team of officers serving the warrant got the name and telephone number of a suspected bird owner from a business card they turned up in a search of the property.

Tricked into coming to check on his roosters, he arrived and was read his rights in both English and Spanish, questioned and searched. He claimed ownership of some of the birds.

The men were detained on suspicion of a variety of cruelty to animal charges and then released. Barrett said he anticipates referring the case to the District Attorney's Office.

Exhausted officers spent Saturday counting, identifying, and taking pictures of the approximately 150 birds.

Lt. Joe DeCosta said the last of the officers finally left the property around 4:30 a.m. Saturday, after they seized 15 of the roosters as evidence. The rest of the roosters were left in their cages, "seized in place." Animal Services will monitor care of the birds left on the site until the case is resolved.

Neighborhood Map

For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.

Back to Top

Add this case to:

Del.icio.us

|

Digg

|

Furl

|

References

Contra Costa Times

« CA State Animal Cruelty Map

Not sure what these icons mean? Click here.

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.