Case Snapshot
Case ID: 20088
Classification: Choking / Strangulation / Suffocation
Animal: dog (non pit-bull)
More cases in San Mateo County, CA
More cases in CA
Abuse was retaliation against animal's bad behavior
Login to Watch this Case

New features are coming soon. Login with Facebook to get an early start and help us test them out!

For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.

Thursday, Jan 23, 2014

County: San Mateo

Charges: Felony CTA
Disposition: Alleged

Alleged: Ryan Gee

San Mateo man pleaded not guilty Thursday to charges he killed his Jack Russell terrier during a psychotic episode.

Ryan Gee, 27, was charged with felony animal abuse Jan. 23 when authorities responded to his home and discovered the remains of his dog, Tipsy, District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe said.

Gee, who has a history of mental health issues, purchased the dog as a companion while attending UC Santa Barbara in 2006, and grew close to the dog over the next eight years. According to Wagstaffe, Gee was alone with the pet in the San Mateo home he shares with his mother and sister and experienced a psychotic break. The man reportedly heard voices that convinced him the dog was a demon.

Gee then allegedly strangled the dog and then cut up its body with a knife. The next day, his family members called authorities after discovering the dog's charred remains in a backyard barbecue, Wagstaffe said.

The man was taken to the hospital and placed on a psychiatric hold, and was later charged with felony animal abuse, Wagstaffe said. He will return to court for trial Aug. 4, and remains out of jail on $50,000 bond.


« CA State Animal Cruelty Map
« More cases in San Mateo County, CA

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.