New features are coming soon. Login with Facebook to get an early start and help us test them out!
|Judge(s):||Truman A. Morrison III|
For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.
Tuesday, Mar 1, 2011County: District of Columbia
Defendant/Suspect: Nico Dauphine
Case Updates: 1 update(s) available
A researcher at the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. has been charged with attempting to poison feral cats. In an initial court appearance, she has pleaded not guilty.
An investigation began in March when a woman who had been putting out food for feral (or wild) cats in Northwest Washington noticed that someone had begun adding a yellow substance to the dish. The cat-lover removed the adulterated food and called the Washington Humane Society.
Investigators sent the added substance to a laboratory at Michigan State University. Analysts there concluded the substance is the main ingredient in commercially-available rat poison.
D.C. investigators also asked to see the security tapes from the front door of the apartment building where the cat food was put out. The cat food bowl happened to be where the camera was located, explained Sr. Officer Jennifer Gardner with the Humane Society, which investigates animal abuse cases. You can see an image of a person going up to the cat food bowl.
Investigators have identified the woman seen in the video as Nico Dauphine, also a resident of the building. Dauphine is a researcher at the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. specializing in the study of migratory birds.
Researchers believe feral cats kill a remarkable number of birds: 480 million a year in the United States (Hildreth, et al, University of Nebraska).
Dauphine did not respond to our request for an interview.
A spokeswoman for the Zoo says Dauphine has no contact with the animal collection, and she remains a migratory bird researcher at the institution while the legal process plays out.
In D.C., a person convicted of attempted animal cruelty could face a jail sentence of up to 180 days.
|When Michael Vick was facing animal cruelty charges four years ago, the star quarterback called on local defense lawyer Billy Martin for help.|
When a National Zoo employee was charged with trying to poison stray cats around her Northwest Washington apartment complex this year, she, too, turned to the powerhouse lawyer. Neither case ended with the defendant's acquittal.
Vick famously pleaded guilty to federal charges in 2007. And on Monday, after two days of testimony from dozens of witnesses last week, a D.C Superior Court judge found Nico Dauphine guilty of attempted cruelty to animals, a misdemeanor. She faces a maximum of 180 days in jail and a $1,000 fine and is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 21.
Martin had argued that although security cameras captured Dauphine, 38, hovering over a bowl of cat food sitting outside the Park Square apartments March 2, she was simply removing the food to keep strays from congregating.
But prosecutors said the 40-second video showed Dauphine removing a plastic bag from her purse, reaching into the bag and dumping poison onto the food. A neighbor reported the incident, and no cats ate poisoned food.
The poison, Martin insisted, was not left by his client.
"Someone else could have leaned in, outside of the camera, and put the poison in it," Martin argued.
Martin called Dauphine to the stand. Dauphine said she received a doctorate from the University of Georgia and was currently working at the National Zoo, where she is studying how domestic cats affect wildlife. The National Zoo's Web site lists her as a postdoctoral fellow with the Migratory Bird Center.
"I've always loved animals, ever since childhood," Dauphine said. "We always had pets when I was growing up."
Dauphine repeatedly denied throwing rat poison on the food. "I would never do anything like that," she said.
But Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin Chambers said Dauphine - who, he said, had complained to building managers about neighbors feeding the cats - tried to kill the felines because she thought they were harming the environment, specifically birds.
During his cross-examination of Dauphine, Chambers introduced several of her published writings in which she allegedly wrote about the "outrage" of the "slaughter" of wildlife caused by cats.
Chambers also introduced a letter she wrote, published in the New York Times in 2007, in which she wrote about the "war between cats and birds" and that the "slaughter" was "one-sided."
Dauphine refuted the examples, saying her writings were misconstrued by the editors.
When he announced his verdict Monday, Senior Judge Truman A. Morrison III said it was the video, along with Dauphine's testimony, that led him to believe she had "motive and opportunity."
He specifically pointed to her repeated denials of her writings.
"Her inability and unwillingness to own up to her own professional writings as her own undermined her credibility," Morrison said.
Morrison said he reviewed the tape and Dauphine's testimony to see whether her case could stand on its own two legs. "Or, in this case, four legs," he said.
Martin declined to comment after the trial.
|Source: washingtonpost.com - Oct 31, 2011|
Update posted on Nov 7, 2011 - 1:08PM
Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.
For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.