Case Details
Share:

Case Snapshot
Case ID: 16533
Classification: Neglect / Abandonment
Animal: dog (non pit-bull)
More cases in QLD
« Back to Search Results
Login to Watch this Case



CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

  • Currently 5.00/5

Case #16533 Rating: 5.0 out of 5



Dog neglected, flesh rotting, puss-covered eyes
Southport, QLD (AU)

Incident Date: Friday, Oct 30, 2009

Disposition: Convicted

Defendant/Suspect: Helen Susan King

A successful Gold Coast businesswoman who neglected her dog for up to eight years in a ''mean, callous and indecent way'' has been hit with more than $6000 in fines and vet bills.

Mother-of-four Helen Susan King, 46, pleaded guilty in Southport Magistrates Court yesterday to one charge of animal cruelty.

The court was told her pet kelpie Blackie was suffering from ''chronic pain and neglect'' when it was seized by the RSPCA from Ms King's Tallebudgera home last October.

The dog was suffering from dead and rotting flesh, teeth worn to the bone, severe hair loss, leathery ''elephant-like'' skin and puss-covered eyes. It was also underweight.

King, who had two other dogs, told the RSPCA that Blackie was ''just an outside dog'' and that she didn't want to spend money on it.

The cruelty charge related to a period of four days but RSPCA barrister Chris George told the court the dog had been suffering from the skin problem for six to eight years.

The court was told she ran a successful business and travelled extensively overseas.

Mr George said it was a ''reprehensible'' case of ''wilful neglect''.

He said Blackie had since been put down, although there was no evidence this was due to its ill-treatment.

Magistrate Brian Kilmartin said King had shown ''callous disregard'' and ''gross cruelty''.

King, who voluntarily paid more than $1400 in vet and court fees before the court hearing, was fined $5000.

Mr Kilmartin did not record a conviction but ordered half the fine be paid to the RSPCA.

He said the penalty should serve as a lesson to anyone who would neglect their animals in such a ''mean, callous and indecent way''.

Outside court, RSPCA inspector Sommer Heath-Crilley said Blackie had been in an ''appalling'' state when he was rescued and it was one of the most prolonged cases of animal neglect she had seen.

She said the RSPCA was ''a little disappointed'' with the fine, given Mr Kilmartin's scathing findings.

''At the end of the day, there are strong comparisons between cruelty to animals and cruelty to children,'' she said.

Defence solicitor Jason Buckland said King was considering appealing against the severity of the fine.

He said she was ''very happy'' the dog had recovered but ''sad it was put down for other reasons''.

References

  • « Back to Search Results

    Add to GoogleNot sure what these icons mean? Click here.

    Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

    For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



    Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2010 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy