Case Snapshot
Case ID: 15841
Classification: Fighting, Mutilation/Torture
Animal: cat
More cases in East Baton Rouge County, LA
More cases in LA
Login to Watch this Case

New features are coming soon. Login with Facebook to get an early start and help us test them out!


Attorneys/Judges
Judge(s): Richard Anderson


For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.


CONVICTED: Was justice served?

Please vote on whether or not you feel the sentence in this case was appropriate for the crime. (Be sure to read the entire case and sentencing before voting.)

weak sentence = one star
strong sentence = 5 stars

more information on voting

When you vote, you are voting on whether or not the punishment fit the crime, NOT on the severity of the case itself. If you feel the sentence was very weak, you would vote 1 star. If you feel the sentence was very strong, you would vote 5 stars.

Please vote honestly and realistically. These ratings will be used a a tool for many future programs, including a "People’s Choice" of best and worst sentencing, DA and judge "report cards", and more. Try to resist the temptation to vote 1 star on every case, even if you feel that 100 years in prison isn’t enough.

Case #15841 Rating: 4.3 out of 5



Wednesday, Jul 9, 2008

County: East Baton Rouge

Charges: Misdemeanor
Disposition: Convicted

Defendants/Suspects:
» Jeremy Johnson
» Travis Johnson

Two Baton Rouge men who recently pleaded guilty in an animal cruelty case involving a pit bull and kittens are not welcome at the parish animal control center, the facility’s director said Monday.

A judge last month ordered brothers Jeremy and Travis Johnson to perform five eight-hour days of community service at the East Baton Rouge Parish Animal Control Center as part of their sentence.

The Johnsons were arrested in July 2008 after they allegedly stood by laughing as their pet pit bull ate a live kitten. Another kitten that had been mauled was found nearby in the grass by animal control officers.

“They are definitely not welcome in this department. They will be run off,’’ Hilton Cole, director of the animal control center, said Monday. “We don’t want dogfighters here. We don’t want cruelty cases.’’

East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney Hillar Moore III said his office will bring the matter to state District Judge Richard Anderson’s attention so the sentence can be amended.

Jeremy Johnson, 18, and Travis Johnson, 24, were charged with aggravated cruelty to animals but pleaded guilty July 22 to simple cruelty to animals.

Police and animal control officers who were dispatched to Bradley Street on July 9, 2008, observed Jeremy Johnson holding the pit bull’s leash while the dog consumed a kitten, police said.

At the time of the incident, Animal Control officers took custody of the pit bull.

In Louisiana, an aggravated cruelty to animals conviction is punishable by one to 10 years in prison. Simple cruelty to animals carries a sentence of up to six months in prison.

Anderson put the Johnsons on bench probation for a year, with several special conditions.

They both must pay a $150 fine, $125 in court costs, perform five eight-hour days of community service at the animal control center, and refrain from all criminal conduct.

“We read them the riot act,’’ said Robert Tucker, who represents Travis Johnson. “We wanted to get their undivided attention. I think they caught on.’’

Cole said he would reserve judgment when asked if justice was served in the case.

“Obviously, it’s a horrific case,’’ he said. “There was intent.’’

The simple cruelty to animals charge may be dismissed at the end of the probationary period, the judge’s order states.

The Johnsons are due back in court in mid-October to show they have paid their fines and court costs and are complying with the conditions of their probation.

References

  • 2theadvocate.com - Aug 11, 2009


« More cases in East Baton Rouge County, LA

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.