| Case ID: 15264 |
| Classification: Neglect / Abandonment |
| Animal: dog (non pit-bull) |
| More cases in Carroll County, VA |
| More cases in VA |
| « Back to Search Results |
| Login to Watch this Case |
New features are coming soon. Login with Facebook to get an early start and help us test them out!
For more information about the Interactive Animal Cruelty Maps, see the map notes.
Tuesday, Jan 27, 2009
County: CarrollCharges: Summary, Misdemeanor
Disposition: Convicted
Defendants/Suspects:
» Lanzie Carroll Horton, Jr.
» Donald Frazier - Not Charged
Case Updates: 1 update(s) available
Gregory Goad, commonwealth attorney in Carroll County, said Lanzie Horton Jr. has been charged under a new Virginia state law concerning dog-breeding kennels.
The law, which went into effect on Jan. 1, makes it illegal to keep more than 50 dogs over one year old.
Goad said Horton had been charged on Jan. 27 with maintaining more than 50 adult dogs, failing to maintain adequate records on the dogs, failure to have certificates that verify the dogs are healthy enough for breeding and 12 counts of animal neglect.
Goad said the new legislation was passed "partly because of the case involving Horton."
Horton made headlines in 2007 after authorities seized about 700 of his more than 1,000 dogs.
He was charged in that case with 14 counts of animal cruelty, 25 counts of neglect and 1 count of failing to obtain a license tax.
Horton was found guilty last May, but his appeal of the animal cruelty convictions is pending in the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
He was sentenced to 14 years of probation and fined $4,775, and is also limited to having a maximum of 250 dogs at his kennels.
Authorities with the Humane Society called Horton's puppy mill the largest they had every investigated.
Goad said an associate of Horton, Donald Frazier, was also charged in connection with running a dog breeding operation.
Frazier was charged with maintaining more than 50 adult dogs, failing to maintain adequate records on the dogs, failure to have certificates that verify the dogs are healthy enough for breeding and seven counts of animal neglect.
Both Horton and Frazier have been released on personal recognizance bonds.
Case Updates
| The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is expressing its gratitude that convicted puppy mill operator Lanzie "Junior" Horton has been ordered to not own or operated a dog kennel in Virginia. Horton was found guilty Friday on two counts of Animal Neglect and other charges. Horton was charged under Virginia's new puppy mill law . According to the HSUS, this is Horton's second conviction for animal related neglect charges since 2007. He's been previously convicted of 25 counts of neglect and 14 counts of cruelty. "The Humane Society of the United States is grateful to the court for its ruling that prevents Junior Horton from ever operating a puppy mill in this state again," said Stephanie Shain, Senior Director of the Puppy Mills campaign for The HSUS. "Unfortunately, since there are still many states that do not currently have legislation against abusive puppy mills, Mr. Horton may simply move his operation elsewhere. We caution neighboring states to be watchful, and urge them to implement strong puppy mill laws like Virginia's." The law went into effect on January 1, 2009. The law now limits the number of breeding dogs permitted at a large-scale dog production facility to no more than 50, and requires female dogs to be examined by a veterinarian prior to breeding, among other improvements, according to the HSUS. Horton's property was randomly inspected in January 2009. During the inspection, the HSUS says numerous violations of the law and resulted in charges were uncovered. The charges included multiple counts of neglect, harboring too many adult dogs and failing to maintain adequate health records, said the HSUS. Puppy mills are mass dog producing facilities that keep animals in cages or kennels, often in squalid conditions with little or no exercise, socialization or human interaction for years on end. To learn more about puppy mills, visit humanesociety.org/puppymills . Below is a timeline issued by the HSUS of the events leading up to Horton's conviction: * January 2009: an animal control officer and a representative of the Virginia state veterinarian's office conducted an unannounced inspection of Horton's property. They once again found numerous alleged violations and charged Horton and his alleged associate, Donald Frazier, with multiple counts of neglect, harboring too many adult dogs and failing to maintain adequate health records. * April 2008: Virginia passed legislation that strengthened protections for dogs in abusive puppy mills. The new law sets specific age standards for breeding, requires annual certification for each dog by a licensed veterinarian, and limits the number of adult dogs kept at one time to no more than 50 dogs, and includes other very basic care standards. * November 2007: Soon after the investigation was released, The HSUS, along with local animal welfare groups, assisted as law enforcement authorities raided Horton's Pups puppy mill and removed more than 700 dogs from deplorable conditions. Horton was charged and convicted of 14 counts of animal cruelty in 2008, but was allowed to keep a maximum of 250 dogs. The conviction was appealed twice and was upheld both times. * November 2007: The HSUS released a five month investigation of Virginia's underground puppy mill industry, including footage of "Horton's Pups," a large-scale, abusive puppy mill with more than 1,000 dogs. The mill was owned and operated by Lanzie "Junior" Horton in Hillsville, Va. |
| Source: WAVY - July 13, 2009 Update posted on Jul 13, 2009 - 11:40PM |
References
- wxii12.com - Feb 17, 2009
« Back to Search Results
« VA State Animal Cruelty Map
« More cases in Carroll County, VA
Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.
For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.