Case Details
Case Snapshot
Case ID: 13339
Classification: Neglect / Abandonment
Animal: rabbit (pet)
View more cases in VA (US)
Login to Watch this Case






Forty-two rabbits found sick, neglected
Fincastle, VA (US)

Incident Date: Tuesday, Mar 11, 2008
County: Botetourt

Disposition: Alleged

Alleged: Jack Cassell

Case Updates: 1 update(s) available

Several dozen rabbits have been rescued from filthy conditions on a Botetourt County farm.

After several warnings from the county, the 42 bunnies were brought to the Regional Center for Animal Control and Protection.

The animals were suffering from several diseases, some of which can be transmitted to humans.

While the investigation is continuing, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Jill Deegan says it's been discovered the farmer was going to sell the sick animals as Easter pets.

"Ultimately these animals were headed, which it was part of our concern knowing the history of the animals. I think it's important when the public is out looking for a pet; you know where your pet is coming from," says Deegan.

The case is still under investigation. The farmer's name has not been released.

In the meantime, the animals will be taken to a sanctuary in Botetourt County to heal before they're made available for adoption.


Case Updates

A Botetourt County man who had dozens of sick rabbits confiscated from his farm said he didn't intend to sell them as Easter pets until they were well.

"The whole thing's been blown out of proportion," Jack Cassell said in an interview Friday.

Botetourt County animal control officers confiscated 42 rabbits over the past few weeks from Cassell's farm off U.S. 220 near Fincastle.

The rabbits were all found to be suffering from a skin disease caused by mites that can be transferred to humans, according to the resulting investigation.

Botetourt County Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Jill Deegan said the rabbits were intended to be sold at Happy's Flea Market in Roanoke.

Greg Beecher, the manager at Happy's, said the sick animals likely wouldn't have made it through the front door, because he doesn't allow unhealthy or dirty-looking animals to be sold there.

"It wouldn't have happened," he said. "We're really strict about it."

Beecher said if he suspects animals are sick or not being cared for properly, he either turns the owners away or calls animal control officers to check out the animals. The market's policy on dogs, for example, is that sellers provide documentation of shots and birth records.

Cassell, 81, who got into trouble with Botetourt County authorities in 2006 over the improper care of horses on his farm, said he spent $1,700 getting the rabbits treated by a Roanoke veterinarian.

"I was working like crazy on them," he said. "I wouldn't spend a thousand and some dollars on them if I wasn't concerned."

Cassell said he didn't intend to sell the rabbits until they got better.

"You can't sell a sick animal," he said.

Cassell appeared at a hearing before a Botetourt general district court judge March 3 to answer to two charges of animal neglect after animal control officers seized two rabbits from his farm last month.

A judge's ruling on the charges was postponed until April 2 pending a court order for Cassell to undergo a mental evaluation to determine whether he can continue to have animals on his farm.

Since the hearing, dozens more rabbits were seized this past week from Cassell's property and found to be suffering from the same skin condition.

So far, no additional charges have been filed against Cassell.

He was convicted in 2006 for not caring properly for horses on his farm. He pleaded guilty that year to two counts of depriving an animal of food and water.

Later that year, Cassell was found in contempt of court twice for ignoring a court order to discontinue breeding horses or have stallions on his farm.
Source: The Roanoke Times - March 15, 2008
Update posted on Mar 15, 2008 - 3:42PM 

References

  • « VA State Animal Cruelty Map

    Add to GoogleNot sure what these icons mean? Click here.

    Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

    For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



    Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2008 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy