Case Details
Share:

Case Snapshot
Case ID: 1127
Classification: Neglect / Abandonment
Animal: dog (non pit-bull)
More cases in ON
Login to Watch this Case




Neglect - 60 sled dogs
Parry Sound, ON (CA)

Incident Date: Thursday, Jul 19, 2001

Disposition: Convicted

Defendants/Suspects:
» Beverly Dawn Boland - Alleged
» William Barry Beynon - Alleged

Case Updates: 1 update(s) available

A couple who operates sled dogs as a tourist attraction has been charged in Parry Sound with animal cruelty. The charges are regarding an emaciated dog found at their site that houses about 60 sled dogs.

Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Ontario SPCA) inspectors charged Beverly Dawn Bowland and William Barry Beynon of the Township of Seguin with failing to provide adequate food and care for the one emaciated dog, and for permitting unnecessary suffering to the dog. The couple will appear in the Ontario Court of Justice, Parry Sound on September 5, 2001 with respect to these charges.

In addition, the Ontario SPCA issued an Order for the two people to improve the feeding and care of the remaining dogs.

The charges and Order result from an investigation by an Ontario SPCA agent who inspected the Bowland-Beynon property to ensure they were complying with an earlier Order to provide veterinary care for the animals. (The couple had appealed that Order, but the Animal Care Review Board - an independent tribunal that can review actions of the Society pertaining to the removal of animals and the issuance of Orders under the Ontario SPCA Act - upheld it.) The agent found the emaciated dog, which led to these charges being laid.


Case Updates

In the latest hearing of the Animal Care Review Board relating to the case of the Parry Sound 'sled' dogs, the Board has ruled that the dogs' owners, Barry Benyon and Beverly Dawn Boland, should repay the amount of $44,851.15 to the Ontario SPCA for expenses incurred since removal of the dogs into the Society's care.

Following the execution of a search warrant on a property in the Parry Sound area on March 31st, 2003, Ontario SPCA Inspectors removed 12 dogs into care and issued orders relating to the care of a further 27 dogs. On April 7th Society Inspectors returned and removed the 27 dogs, on veterinary recommendation, for non-compliance with the orders.

The dogs were in poor body condition with emaciation, skin abrasions, external and internal parasites. One of the dogs required removal of an eye due to untreated glaucoma, and his other eye had a retinal detachment with hemorrhaging. Sadly, another of the dogs was in such poor condition euthanasia was necessary. Living conditions at the property were assessed as extremely unsanitary, with inadequate water and access to shelter. The dogs are currently being cared for by the Ontario SPCA Barrie, Orillia and Midland Branches and at the Ontario SPCA Centre in Whitchurch-Stouffville.

The owner appealed the removal of the dogs, and at a hearing of the Animal Care Review Board at the OPP Headquarters in Orillia on June 2nd, the Board - an independent tribunal, upheld the Society's actions in removing the dogs into care.

At a subsequent hearing on June 26th the Board ruled that the dogs' owners should repay the Ontario SPCA costs in the amount of $44,851.15 for expenses incurred from the date of removal of the dogs. The owners have five days to repay the Society, and failure to do so will result in the dogs becoming available for adoption to new homes. The owners have the right to further appeal to the Superior Court of Justice
Source: OSPCA - July 3, 2003
Update posted on Nov 27, 2005 - 6:18PM 

References

Add to GoogleAdd to My Yahoo!Not sure what these icons mean? Click here.

Note: Classifications and other fields should not be used to determine what specific charges the suspect is facing or was convicted of - they are for research and statistical purposes only. The case report and subsequent updates outline the specific charges. Charges referenced in the original case report may be modified throughout the course of the investigation or trial, so case updates, when available, should always be considered the most accurate reflection of charges.

For more information regarding classifications and usage of this database, please visit the database notes and disclaimer.



Send this page to a friend
© Copyright 2001-2010 Pet-Abuse.Com. All rights reserved. Site Map ¤ Disclaimer ¤ Privacy Policy